More Related News
BUSINESS NEWS
By Evan Sande Ndahura
Every election season in Uganda follows a familiar script.
Candidates for Parliament stand before hopeful crowds and promise roads where there are none, bridges across seasonal streams, schools in every parish, health centres in every village, school fees for the needy, capital for youth groups, and houses for the vulnerable. They pledge to “fight poverty” personally and to deliver development directly. The applause is immediate. The votes often follow. But the Constitution remains unmoved.
What the Law Actually Provides
Chapter Six of the Constitution of Uganda is not ambiguous about the role of Parliament.
Article 79 provides:
That is the constitutional mandate.
An MP is first and foremost:
An MP is not a contractor.
Not a district engineer.
Not a Ministry of Works.
Not a local government executive.
And yet, during campaigns, those distinctions dissolve.
The Dangerous Theatre of Campaign Promises
Why do candidates overpromise?
Because development is visible. Law-making is not.
A newly constructed borehole can be photographed.
A properly amended budget clause cannot.
Voters, often deprived of civic education, measure performance by tangible projects rather than legislative effectiveness. Politicians respond to this incentive by transforming themselves into quasi-development agents.
But Uganda operates under a decentralised governance structure. Service delivery—roads, health centres, schools, and water infrastructure—is primarily the responsibility of the Executive and local governments. Parliament’s role is structural: to legislate, allocate resources, and supervise.
When MPs campaign as implementers rather than overseers, they distort constitutional design.
When Promises Become Debts
The tragedy unfolds after swearing-in.
Constituents begin demanding fulfilment of campaign pledges:
“Honourable, when are you building the road?”
“Honourable, you promised school fees.”
“Honourable, our health centre still lacks a maternity ward.”
Unable to admit that they overstated their authority, many MPs attempt to maintain the illusion. They divert salaries, contribute at funerals and fundraisers, and finance community drives. Some borrow heavily from financial institutions. Others exhaust personal assets.
Across political cycles, public discourse has repeatedly revealed legislators struggling under significant private debt burdens accumulated during campaigns and tenure—not because the Constitution requires personal financing of development, but because political culture demands it. The lie becomes expensive. And the cost is personal.
Institutional Damage
The consequences are not merely financial.
When MPs spend their time appeasing local expectations:
The Civic Education Deficit
At the heart of this crisis lies a profound absence of civic literacy.
Many citizens do not understand:
Ignorance becomes political capital. Some legislators exploit this gap deliberately. By financing small-scale projects, they cultivate loyalty while avoiding deeper structural accountability. The spectacle of charity overshadows the responsibility of governance. But charity cannot replace constitutional order.
A Republic Demands Honesty
If Members of Parliament faithfully executed Article 79—making sound laws, rigorously supervising budgets, and defending constitutionalism—development would not depend on individual generosity. It would flow from institutional strength. The road would be built because Parliament ensured proper allocation and oversight.
The hospital would function because legislative scrutiny prevented misuse of funds.
The school would operate because democratic governance was protected. That is sustainable development. Anything else is theatrical politics.
Conclusion: The Burden of False Mandates
The gravest danger is not the broken promise of a bridge. It is the corrosion of constitutional clarity.
When legislators campaign as contractors, democracy becomes performance. When voters reward exaggeration, institutions are weakened. When MPs borrow to sustain unrealistic expectations, accountability is mortgaged.
The lie that wins applause in the village square often becomes the debt that burdens the Honourable Member in office. Until civic education becomes central to our political culture—from Kampala to the most remote parish—parliamentary politics will remain trapped in a cycle of inflated promises and frustrated constituencies.
Article 79 has spoken clearly. The question is whether we, as citizens and leaders, are ready to listen.
About the Author
Evan Sande Ndahura is a Ugandan political and legal commentator, columnist, poet, and social justice advocate whose writings focus on governance, constitutionalism, democracy, and the political economy of power in Africa. He is widely published on issues of judicial accountability, electoral justice, human rights, and institutional reform, with particular emphasis on Uganda’s political and legal systems. Ndahura writes from a Pan-African critical perspective, interrogating the failures of state institutions and the lived realities of ordinary citizens under entrenched systems of power in Africa. He believes that the liberation of Africa will occur through a mighty pen, not the gun.