Opinions
Jun 20th, 2026

Banyankole, Learn From History: Why We Should Condemn Unlawful Arrests And Torture Today, Not Tomorrow

Written By | Martin Rushegyera

OPINION

History offers difficult lessons for societies that ignore injustice when it appears to benefit them.
Across different countries and different eras, one pattern often emerges: when political transitions become violent, unstable, or driven by revenge, communities associated—fairly or unfairly—with outgoing leadership often bear the consequences long after power changes hands.
This is not an argument rooted in fear, nor is it an accusation against any community. It is an argument for principle.
When institutions weaken and politics becomes personal, the identities of leaders often become attached to regions, tribes, clans, or communities.

In such moments, ordinary people can become symbols of political systems they neither created nor controlled.
Periods of political stability can make it tempting to remain silent about arrests without due process, torture, or the unequal application of the law, especially when such actions appear to target opponents or seem politically convenient.
Yet history repeatedly suggests that silence in one era can become vulnerability in the next.
Societies are strongest not when power is concentrated, but when institutions are trusted and the law is applied equally to all citizens.

Iraq: When Political Change Became Collective Punishment
Iraq's experience after the fall of Saddam Hussein remains one of the clearest examples of how communities associated with political power can later become vulnerable.
Saddam came from the Al-Bu Nasir Sunni Arab tribe around Tikrit, and many influential positions in government, intelligence, and the military were widely associated with networks linked to his region and tribe.
When his government collapsed in 2003 and Saddam was later executed in 2006, the political order changed overnight.
In the years that followed, reports emerged of violence, displacement, exclusion, and retaliation affecting communities associated with the previous system. Saddam's home area, Awja, became a symbol of that transition.
Members of communities linked to the former regime experienced social and political isolation, while many families left Iraq and remained in exile.
The lesson is not to defend dictatorship. It is to recognize that when accountability expands into collective blame, ordinary citizens often suffer.

Somalia: When Identity Became a Matter of Survival
Somalia's collapse in 1991 offers another difficult lesson.
As state institutions disappeared, politics increasingly reorganized around clan identity. Communities became associated with competing centres of power, and retaliation often followed shifts in control.
For many Somalis, clan identity ceased to be primarily cultural and instead became closely tied to security and survival.
Large numbers of civilians fled their homes, seeking refuge across the region. Families were displaced not necessarily because of their individual actions, but because of broader perceptions and associations. The burden again fell most heavily on ordinary people.

Rwanda: Political Violence and the Cost of Collective Suspicion
Rwanda's post-1994 experience demonstrates how political violence leaves deep and lasting consequences.
After the genocide and the transition in state authority, millions of civilians crossed into neighbouring countries amid fear, instability, and uncertainty.
Many people experienced displacement, detention, or suspicion during a period when political identity and security became deeply intertwined.
This does not erase accountability for genocide, nor does it equate victims with perpetrators. Rather, it reminds societies of the importance of ensuring that responsibility remains individual and lawful rather than collective and permanent.

Libya: Political Victory Without Reconciliation
Libya's experience after 2011 offers another warning. 
Following the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, communities perceived to have benefited from or supported the previous order experienced retaliation, displacement, and exclusion.
One of the most cited examples was Tawergha, where large numbers of residents were displaced and remained unable to return for years.
Political transition alone did not automatically produce reconciliation.

Uganda's Challenge: Protect Institutions Before Power Changes
Uganda's future will be shaped by its own history, institutions, and decisions.
These international examples should not be treated as predictions for Uganda, but as reminders of what can happen when institutions weaken and justice becomes selective.

If people are arrested, tortured, humiliated, or denied due process today because of who they are, who they know, or the political side to which they are perceived to belong, then tomorrow another government may justify doing the same to others.
History shows that once abuse becomes normalized, no community remains permanently protected.
For the Banyankole—and indeed for all Ugandans—the lesson should not be self-preservation alone.
It should be a commitment to principle.

Why Equal Justice Matters to Every Community
If arrests without due process, torture, or political targeting are wrong when directed at opponents, they remain wrong even when aimed at those we support or identify with.
Protection does not begin when a community becomes vulnerable.
It begins much earlier, when citizens defend institutions, fairness, constitutionalism, and equal protection under the law for everyone.
The Banyankole have contributed to Uganda's development through agriculture, education, business, public service, and community building across generations. 
Their future security, like that of every Ugandan community, does not rest on political dominance but on belonging to a country where rights and protections do not depend on who holds power.

Using History as a Warning, Not a Weapon
If future generations are to inherit a peaceful Uganda, then the standard must remain simple:
Reject the abuse of power today so that tomorrow no community lives in fear of collective blame.
History should not be used to divide people. It should be used to guide them.
A wise person learns from experience.
A wiser person learns from the experience of others.

About the Author
Martin Rushegyera is a former Municipal Mayor aspirant for Bushenyi–Ishaka Municipality.

Published By | Features Editor

More Related News