Written By | Staff Writer
KISORO
Kisoro District Education Officer Mwumvaneza Emmanuel has been arraigned in court on charges of embezzlement, making false claims by an official and abuse of office following investigations into alleged financial irregularities in a UGX 1.4 billion classroom construction programme.
The charges were brought following a joint investigation by the State House Anti-Corruption Unit, the Criminal Investigations Directorate (CID) and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP).
The investigations centre on the implementation of Kisoro District’s classroom construction programme for the 2024/2025 financial year, which was allocated UGX 1.4 billion.
According to the investigators, the probe uncovered a suspected scheme in which school construction contracts were allegedly awarded to companies owned by or linked to district officials. Payments were also reportedly processed without proper verification of the work completed.
Kisoro District Education Officer Mwumvaneza Emmanuel
Investigators are further examining allegations that classroom blocks constructed by communities were presented as newly completed government projects. The alleged practice has raised questions about the accuracy of project accountability records, the quality and extent of construction works delivered, and the possible loss of public funds.
Mwumvaneza faces additional charges relating to the alleged misappropriation of UGX 8,252,200 that had been advanced for the commissioning of education projects.
He is also accused of making a false entry indicating that he attended a commissioning activity and instructing officials to pay allowances for commissioning activities that were allegedly not undertaken.
The case forms part of investigations into the management of public resources earmarked for education infrastructure and the accountability of officials involved in the implementation of government-funded projects.
The charges against Mwumvaneza remain allegations to be determined through the judicial process. His arraignment does not, in itself, establish guilt.