Written By | Staff Writer
NARO
Search
Kampala
Uganda has bred prize-winning maize and bean varieties, trained scores of plant scientists, and built one of the most active agricultural research systems in East Africa. Yet on the average smallholder's plot, yields still limp along at roughly a third of what those very varieties are capable of producing. That gap — between what science has already delivered and what actually grows in Ugandan soil — was the uncomfortable centerpiece of a gathering of government officials, scientists and development partners in Kampala this past week, and it is reshaping how the country's next phase of agricultural policy is being written.
The occasion was the AGRA@20 Uganda Country Celebration, held at the Kampala Serena Hotel to mark two decades of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa's work in the country. Billed partly as a retrospective, the event quickly turned into something closer to a diagnosis. Officials from the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF), researchers from the National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO) and Makerere University, seed companies, farmer organisations and AGRA's own leadership converged on a single, blunt conclusion: Uganda does not have a science problem. It has a delivery problem.
"Agricultural extension is the bridge between research and transformation," said Dr Patience Rwamigisa, Commissioner for Extension Coordination at MAAIF, framing the challenge that would recur throughout the day. Uganda, she and others argued, has produced no shortage of improved seed varieties and climate-adapted technologies. What it has consistently failed to do is get that knowledge into the hands — and onto the fields — of the roughly 70 percent of Ugandans who depend on agriculture for their livelihoods.
The numbers presented put hard edges on that argument. Professor Benard Bashasha of Makerere University told the gathering that many of Uganda's staple commodities are stuck with a yield gap of close to 70 percent — meaning farmers are harvesting less than a third of what existing, already-available technology could produce on the same land. That is not a hypothetical ceiling requiring further scientific breakthroughs; it is a shortfall between proven innovation and its uptake.
Bashasha's explanation for the gap has become something of an organizing metaphor for the sector: Uganda has invested heavily in the "hardware" of agricultural transformation — improved seed, fertiliser, climate-smart technology — while starving the "software" that makes hardware useful. That software, he said, is extension work, farmer education, and the institutional systems that help ordinary growers translate a new seed variety or a new planting technique into higher output and higher income.
The hardware-software imbalance shows up starkly in Uganda's extension statistics. The country currently employs roughly 3,346 agricultural extension workers against an estimated need of 10,000 to serve its farming population adequately, according to Ministry of Agriculture data reported earlier this year. That leaves a ratio of about one extension worker for every 1,800 farmers, more than three times the internationally recommended benchmark of one for every 500. Government has made some progress — recruiting 3,854 extension staff, or 77 percent of a 5,000-person hiring target, at district and sub-county level — but the shortfall remains large enough to explain much of the productivity stagnation officials described in Kampala.
The consequences of that gap ripple well beyond individual farm yields. Dr Sadik Kasimu, Deputy Director General of NARO, told participants that lifting productivity requires simultaneous investment across an entire chain: soil fertility, water management, crop and animal health, improved seed, and sound agronomic practice — none of which matters if farmers never learn how to apply it correctly. He singled out water harvesting, irrigation and drought-tolerant varieties as increasingly urgent given Uganda's worsening exposure to erratic rainfall and prolonged dry spells, a climate reality that has already produced crop losses and livestock deaths in northern and cattle-corridor districts this year. Kasimu also pushed researchers to think beyond raw yield, arguing that crop-breeding programmes should be designed around the quality specifications that millers, brewers, bakeries and other processors actually need — tying agricultural research more directly to Uganda's broader industrialisation ambitions rather than treating farm output and factory demand as separate problems.
Not all the news from the gathering was grim. Chris Muwanika, Chief Executive Officer of NARO Holdings Limited, reported that the organisation now supplies more than 90 percent of national demand for early-generation seed — the foundational seed stock from which commercial varieties are multiplied — for staples such as beans and maize, a turnaround credited to reforms supported by AGRA. That success has attracted interest from Ethiopia and Rwanda, both looking to replicate Uganda's public-private model for seed multiplication. Muwanika cautioned, however, that scientific innovation only matters once it is commercialised and delivered through products and services farmers can actually access — echoing the extension argument from a different angle.
AGRA's own scorecard, presented at the event, illustrates both the scale of two decades of investment and how much distance remains. Since establishing its Uganda programme, the organisation says it has supported 49 master's students and 20 doctoral candidates in plant breeding and soil science, contributed to the release of 59 crop varieties — 56 of which have since been commercialised — and reached 427,806 farmers with information on value chains, mechanisation, insurance and market pricing. It has backed seven seed companies, established 440 aggregation centres where smallholders can pool produce for sale, and facilitated credit guarantee schemes that unlocked $25 million in financing for more than 50,000 farmers, alongside $62.8 million leveraged for agribusiness SMEs. AGRA Uganda Country Director David Wozemba Wetaka framed the philosophy behind those figures directly: "Africa cannot import agricultural transformation but must build it through homegrown science, strong institutions and sustained investment in farmers."
Market access emerged as the discussion's other recurring theme, tightly linked to the extension problem. Collins Amanya, Assistant Commissioner for Planning at MAAIF, argued that smallholders need to aggregate through cooperatives if they are to supply larger buyers consistently and negotiate fair prices — a structural fix that also requires the extension and organisational support currently in short supply. He called for stronger traceability systems to satisfy the quality assurance demands of both domestic processors and export markets, and urged Uganda's diplomatic missions abroad to take a more active role in opening new markets for the country's agricultural output. Bashasha reinforced the point from the production side, warning that raising yields alone will not lift farmer incomes if crops cannot find reliable buyers or if a large share of the harvest is lost after it leaves the field — a caution against treating productivity as a problem separate from post-harvest handling and market infrastructure.
For Uganda's roughly four million farming households, the implications of this diagnosis are significant, if unglamorous. It suggests that closing the country's agricultural income gap may depend less on the next miracle seed variety and more on unspectacular, expensive, sustained investment in people: more extension officers, better-organised cooperatives, functioning aggregation centres, and reliable links from farm gate to processor to export market. AGRA's next phase in Uganda, running through its 2024–2028 country strategy, is explicitly built around that shift — prioritising quality seed systems, inclusive markets and trade, sustainable farming practices, and stronger policy and institutional capacity, rather than research output alone.
Wetaka summarised the pivot succinctly: the next phase of the AGRA-Uganda partnership, he said, will focus on connecting farmers more effectively to markets, finance, technology and investment opportunities. Two decades in, the message from Uganda's agricultural establishment is that the science has largely done its job. What remains is the harder, slower work of delivery — and until the extension worker deficit and market linkage gaps close, that 70 percent yield gap is likely to persist as one of the most expensive missed opportunities in Uganda's economy.
